E106/2/5/43A
Names of Proprietors | Names of Lands | Valuation |
---|---|---|
The lands of Gairnieston, Fishery, Montcoffer, and others | Scots Money | |
1 The Trustees of the Duke of Fife | Various Lands | £422.1.8 |
2Trustees of James Wilson Leggat | Gairnieston | £112.14.4 |
3 Mrs Agnes Howie, Maggie, Johanna S. Mary and Caroline Leggat and William K. Leggat | Yonderton | £75.19.5 |
4 George Barclay | Strocherie | £108.14.9 |
5 Patrick Duncan | Balchers, Danshillock, etc | £97.16.7 |
6 Alexander George, Solicitor, MacDuff | Muirton | £40.17.7 |
7 Robert B. Elrick | Mains of Blackton | £39.10.8 |
8 Andrew M. Ellis | Croft Woodside | £5.12.11 |
9 William Murison | Croft Wateryslack | £2.17.3 |
10 Annie W. Craig and Mrs Simpson | Croft Gorrachie Bridge | £1.11.10 |
11 John Smith | Auchlinn | £88.3.7 |
12 Alexander Slessor | Milltown of Fishery | £78.17.1 |
13 Trustees of late James Tennant | Burn of Cake | £71.3.0 |
14 George Strachan, Montcoffer Mains, Alvah, Banff | Cowesmill | £60.18.10 |
15 James Massie | Milltack | £58.2.8 |
16 George and Helen Murray | Faichfolds | £54.7.7 |
Carry forward | £1319.9.9 |
Transcribe other information
SCHEME OF ALLOCATION between and among the Trustees of His GRACE THE DUKE OF FIFE K.G., [Knight of the Garter] K.T., [Knight of the Thistle] and purchasers from him or their Successors, of the Old Valued Rent of the portions of the Fife Estates lying in the Parish of King Edward and County of Aberdeen.January 1913
The Valued Rents of the following lands in the Parish of King Edward formerly belonging to the Duke of Fife, are as follows:-
The lands of Gairnieston, Fishery, Montcoffer, and others -- £1983.6.8
The lands of Meikle and Little Gorrachies -- £61.0.0
[Total] -- £2044.6.8
The above sums are allocated below in the same proportions as the Stipend formerly payable by His Grace previous to the commencement of the land sales was allocated in the State of Teinds prepared by Mr. H. Inglis Lindsay W. S. [Writer to the Signet] in 1903, and the scheme of Locality which followed upon it. An allocation made on the immediate basis of the real rents would no doubt be more strictly in accordance with the principle, but in many cases the amounts of the real rents at the dates of the sales are not readily ascertainable. And as the allocation of the Stipend was made on the basis of the real rents, it follows that the present one also proceeds on that basis, though not directly.
[Page] 43A
Transcriber's notes
Notes in green & red ink have not been transcribedTranscribers who have contributed to this page.
Dauvit- Moderator, haggis
Location information for this page.